Base Closure list due soon

Hit Counter
Since 05-10-05


 

From: Waspscpo@aol.com [mailto:Waspscpo@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 7:51 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: Closure list due soon


http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/05/05/10/100loc_bases001.cfm

Closure list due soon

Local officials are optimistic Navy bases in Everett and Oak Harbor will be spared.

By Brian Kelly
Herald Writer
Tuesday, May 10, 2005


With the Pentagon's list of must-close military bases expected to come out later this week, local leaders are confident they've made the best case possible for keeping Naval Station Everett open. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is expected to announce Friday which military bases will close as the country tones its military muscle to handle future threats to national security. Called the base realignment and closure process, this round is the first since 1995 and the fifth since the first one in 1988.Navy supporters and government officials have been working to keep Naval Station Everett off this year's list.

A similar effort is under way in Oak Harbor to keep Whidbey Island Naval Air Station intact. "We are very much in a wait-and-see mode," Everett Mayor Ray Stephanson said.  "And I remain optimistic that our base will remain open. I feel very good about the case we've made." Naval Station Everett opened more than a decade ago and is now homeport for the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, as well as guided-missile frigates and destroyers.

It's also home to two Coast Guard ships. Local leaders have made repeated trips to the nation's capital in recent years to talk with elected leaders and Pentagon officials about base closures. Gov. Christine Gregoire and members of Washington's Congressional delegation also sent a special report to the base closure commission late last month that detailed the strategic value of the state's military installations. The report stresses that Washington's bases comprise the best staging ground for military missions in the Asia-Pacific region, and military forces here can be mobilized faster than those from other areas.

The Pacific Northwest also has superior training areas and some of the newest and most-modern facilities. Gregoire is visiting Navy supporters in Oak Harbor today to talk about base-closure issues after a tour of Whidbey Island Naval Air Station. Here in Everett, keeping Naval Station Everett open means preserving a core piece of the county's economy. With approximately 6,300 civilian and military employees, the Navy base is the county's second-largest employer. Their earnings pumped an estimated $431 million into Snohomish County's economy in 2003.Still, the economic value of Naval Station Everett won't be what keeps it open.

In previous closure rounds, few bases were kept off the closure list because of the impact to local economies, according to a report issued last week by the Government Accountability Office. The Pentagon has been very clear that military value is critical, said U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen, D-Wash.  Larsen serves on the House Armed Services Committee. Pressing that case for strategic value is a little like fly-fishing, he said. "You have to act like the bait and think like the fish," Larsen said. "What is the Pentagon going to look at when it makes its recommendations, and then try to craft the argument that fits how that big fish is thinking. "Everett and Whidbey both have done a great job of answering those kinds of questions on military value," Larsen said. Supporters of Naval Station Everett say it surpasses the criteria for staying open.

Naval Station Everett is the Navy's newest homeport with the country's fastest access to deep water. Access isn't limited by the tides, and dredging isn't needed, either. The installation is the most environmentally friendly for carrier installations, and Naval Station Everett has room to take on more ships and sailors. Beyond the strategic value of Naval Station Everett and other military installations in the Puget Sound region, some are seeing other reasons for optimism. Rumsfeld told reporters last week that this base-closure round won't be as extensive as earlier thought.

Previously, defense officials had said that up to 25 percent of the nation's military bases could be closed in this round.  Rumsfeld said the coming closures could be half that amount, according to an Associated Press report. The reason: U.S. bases will be closed overseas, and assets from those installations will be reassigned to bases at home. Larsen said there are other factors that may help Everett and Oak Harbor. The Navy was hit hard in earlier rounds, which may mean Navy cuts could be less this time. Also different is a higher focus on homeland defense, which makes Naval Station Everett and other facilities more critical given their location in the northwest corner of the country.

And lastly, Larsen said, military installations here can help with the challenging efforts to recruit and retain people in uniform. "You want to have a place that provides a quality of life that keeps people coming back. In the Pacific Northwest, we can offer that," Larsen said. Even after Rumsfeld releases his list, work will continue to keep local installations from closure. "Most people think a marathon is 26.2 miles long," Larsen said. "When the list comes out, we've only hit mile 26 on this." 

Stephanson added: "I think it really continues beyond the president making his final up-or-down decision.

"I think we live in the world where base closures and adjustments are going to continue for the foreseeable future," he said.

Reporter Brian Kelly: 425-339-3422 or kelly@heraldnet.com .
---------------------------------------------------------
Contributed,
YNCS Don Harribine, USN(ret)